LiDAR Coverage in New Zealand
Whether there is 1 m LiDAR over your place, what year it was flown, and what you get where there isn't any. 104 LINZ surveys across 16 regions, 2008–2026.
Check LiDAR coverage for a place
Search any New Zealand town, street address or landmark. The answer comes from the elevation data itself, not from a survey outline.
Coverage is a question with three parts
“Is there LiDAR here?” sounds like a yes or no, but the answer that actually helps has three parts, and most coverage maps only give you the first.
- Is the area flown at all? Most of populated New Zealand is. The gaps are in remote alpine and back-country terrain.
- When was it flown? This is the part that decides whether you can trust the data for a decision. A digital elevation model records the ground on the day of the flight, and the ground moves — earthworks, subdivision, forestry, slips, river migration.
- Which product exists? Bare-earth DEM, surface DSM, or both. They answer different questions and are not interchangeable.
The checker above answers all three for a specific point, and the index further down lets you browse every survey by region.
How the coverage check works
There are two ways to answer “is this point covered”, and they disagree more often than you would expect.
The quick way is to test the point against a survey's published extent. That is what a survey index gives you, and it is what most coverage maps show. The problem is that an extent is a rectangle drawn around an irregular flight footprint. A property near the edge of a survey can sit comfortably inside the rectangle while the actual flight lines stopped at the ridge behind it.
The reliable way is to read the elevation data. The checker above samples the real 1 m LiDAR raster around your point and reports what proportion came back from LiDAR versus the 8 m fallback. Zero fallback means genuine LiDAR; a mix means you are on a survey boundary. Once the data confirms something is there, the survey catalogue supplies the name, the capture years and who commissioned the flight.
What you get where there is no LiDAR
Elevation does not simply stop outside a survey. It falls back to the national 8 m DEM, which LINZ produced in 2011 by interpolating the 20 m contour lines from the 1:50,000 topographic map series. LINZ's own description of it is unusually direct: suitable for cartographic visualisation purposes only. Not suitable for terrain analysis.
That distinction has practical consequences:
- Contour intervals below about 5 m are meaningless on 8 m data — the source contours were 20 m apart, so anything finer is invented by the interpolation.
- Slope and aspect on gentle ground are unreliable. On a 3° paddock the 8 m DEM's own noise is larger than the signal.
- Building platforms, drainage and cut-and-fill need LiDAR. Half a metre matters, and the 8 m DEM cannot see half a metre.
It remains genuinely useful for the shape of a catchment, a regional terrain picture, or a hillshade backdrop. Every result this site produces states what proportion came from the fallback, so a mixed answer is never passed off as LiDAR.
DEM or DSM — which one you want
| Product | What it measures | Use it for |
|---|---|---|
| DEM | Bare earth, with vegetation and buildings removed | Ground contours, slope, drainage, earthworks volumes, flood paths |
| DSM | Top of everything — canopy, roofs, powerlines | Shading and sun hours, line of sight over shelterbelts, canopy height, roof geometry |
This site's tools read the DEM, because the questions it answers — contours, slope, viewshed, drainage, terrain reports — are all ground questions. Both products are published for most surveys and both are free.
Every LiDAR survey in New Zealand, by region
104 surveys across 16 regions, 12,584 tiles in total, taken straight from the LINZ STAC catalogue on the Registry of Open Data on AWS. Last refreshed 2026-08-16.
Auckland
4 surveys · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auckland Part 1 | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 109 |
| Auckland Part 2 | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 172 |
| Auckland North | 2016–2018 | Auckland Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 187 |
| Auckland South | 2016–2017 | Auckland Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 83 |
Bay of Plenty
7 surveys · most recent 2026
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay of Plenty - Waioweka Gorge | 2026 | New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 7 |
| Bay of Plenty - Tauranga | 2025 | BOPLASS | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 22 |
| Bay of Plenty | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 76 |
| Bay of Plenty | 2019–2022 | BOPLASS | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 454 |
| Bay of Plenty - Tauranga | 2022 | BOPLASS | DEM · 1 m | 22 |
| Bay of Plenty | 2018–2019 | BOPLASS | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 86 |
| Bay of Plenty - Tauranga and Coast | 2015 | BOPLASS | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 64 |
Canterbury
22 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canterbury | 2020–2025 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 1,273 |
| Canterbury - Christchurch | 2024–2025 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 27 |
| Canterbury - Banks Peninsula | 2023 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 54 |
| Canterbury - Selwyn | 2023 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 102 |
| Canterbury - Waimakariri | 2023 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 19 |
| Canterbury - Kaikōura and Waimakariri | 2022 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 34 |
| Canterbury - Christchurch | 2020–2021 | Christchurch City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 27 |
| Canterbury - Banks Peninsula | 2018–2019 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 47 |
| Canterbury | 2018–2019 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 290 |
| Canterbury - Christchurch and Ashley River | 2018–2019 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 36 |
| Canterbury | 2016–2017 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 175 |
| Canterbury - Kaikōura | 2016–2017 | Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand | DEM · 1 m | 115 |
| Canterbury - Cheviot | 2015 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 5 |
| Canterbury - Christchurch and Selwyn | 2015 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 90 |
| Canterbury - Hawarden | 2015 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 4 |
| Canterbury - Mackenzie | 2015 | Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 44 |
| Canterbury - Rangiora | 2014 | Waimakariri District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 32 |
| Canterbury - Timaru Rivers | 2014 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 36 |
| Canterbury - Hurunui Rivers | 2013 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 53 |
| Canterbury - Amberley | 2012 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 13 |
| Canterbury - Kaikōura | 2012 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 44 |
| Canterbury | 2010 | Environment Canterbury | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 100 |
Gisborne
3 surveys · most recent 2026
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisborne - Hicks Bay | 2026 | New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 9 |
| Gisborne | 2023 | National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 305 |
| Gisborne | 2018–2020 | Gisborne District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 305 |
Hawke's Bay
3 surveys · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawke's Bay | 2023–2024 | National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 498 |
| Gisborne and Hawke's Bay - Cyclone Gabrielle River Flood | 2023 | National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 127 |
| Hawke's Bay | 2020–2021 | Hawke's Bay Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 471 |
Manawatū-Whanganui
10 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Oroua | 2025 | Horizons Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 94 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Whanganui River Catchment | 2025 | Ngā Tāngata Tiaki o Whanganui | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 298 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Levin | 2024 | New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 11 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 138 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui | 2022–2023 | Horizons Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 92 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Dannevirke | 2022 | Tararua District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 3 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Rangitīkei River | 2021 | Horizons Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 30 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Whanganui Urban | 2020–2021 | Whanganui District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 24 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui - Palmerston North | 2018 | Palmerston North City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 23 |
| Manawatū-Whanganui | 2015–2016 | Horizons Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 153 |
Marlborough
3 surveys · most recent 2022
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlborough | 2020–2022 | Marlborough District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 408 |
| Marlborough | 2018 | Marlborough District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 52 |
| Marlborough - Blenheim | 2014 | Marlborough District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 34 |
Nelson
3 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson | 2025 | Nelson City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 26 |
| Nelson and Tasman - Top of the South Flood | 2022 | Nelson City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 56 |
| Nelson | 2021 | Nelson City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 28 |
Northland
4 surveys · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northland | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 153 |
| Northland | 2018–2020 | Northland Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 502 |
| Northland - Marsden Point | 2016 | Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 4 |
| Northland - Whangarei Heads | 2016 | Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 9 |
Otago
11 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otago - Cardrona | 2025 | Queenstown-Lakes District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 4 |
| Otago - Kingston | 2025 | Queenstown-Lakes District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 2 |
| Otago - Central Otago | 2022–2023 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 143 |
| Otago - Wanaka | 2022–2023 | Queenstown-Lakes District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 12 |
| Otago - Coastal Catchments | 2021 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 187 |
| Otago - Dunedin and Mosgiel | 2021 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 7 |
| Otago - Central Otago | 2021 | Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 38 |
| Otago - Queenstown | 2021 | Queenstown-Lakes District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 13 |
| Otago - Balclutha | 2020 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 24 |
| Otago | 2016 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 160 |
| Otago - Queenstown | 2016 | Otago Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 19 |
Southland
2 surveys · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southland | 2020–2024 | Environment Southland | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 665 |
| Stewart Island / Rakiura - Oban | 2021 | Environment Southland | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 4 |
Taranaki
1 survey · most recent 2021
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taranaki | 2021 | Taranaki Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 282 |
Tasman
10 surveys · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tasman - Motueka River Valley | 2024 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 30 |
| Tasman - Abel Tasman and Golden Bay | 2023 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 41 |
| Tasman - Waimea Dam | 2023 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 1 |
| Tasman - Tasman Bay | 2022 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 29 |
| Tasman | 2020–2022 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 310 |
| Tasman - Motueka River Valley | 2018–2019 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 29 |
| Tasman - Golden Bay | 2017 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 52 |
| Tasman - Abel Tasman and Golden Bay | 2016 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 28 |
| Tasman - Richmond and Motueka | 2015 | Tasman District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 22 |
| Nelson and Tasman | 2008–2015 | Nelson City Council | DEM · 1 m | 112 |
Waikato
9 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waikato - Hamilton | 2025 | Hamilton City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 23 |
| Waikato | 2024 | Regional Software Holdings Limited | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 199 |
| Waikato - Hamilton | 2023 | Hamilton City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 23 |
| Waikato | 2021 | Waikato Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 873 |
| Waikato - Hamilton | 2019 | Hamilton City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 23 |
| Waikato - Reporoa and Upper Piako River | 2019 | Waikato Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 26 |
| Waikato - Huntly | 2015–2019 | Waikato Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 53 |
| Waikato - Thames | 2017–2019 | Waikato Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 13 |
| Waikato - West Coast and Hauraki Plains | 2015 | Waikato Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 86 |
Wellington
11 surveys · most recent 2025
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wellington - Kāpiti Coast | 2024–2025 | Kāpiti Coast District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 19 |
| Wellington - Hutt City | 2025 | Hutt City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 12 |
| Wellington - South Wairarapa | 2025 | Greater Wellington Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 39 |
| Wellington - Wellington City | 2025 | Wellington City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 12 |
| Wellington - Upper Hutt City | 2025 | Upper Hutt City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 7 |
| Wellington - Porirua | 2023 | Porirua City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 14 |
| Wellington - Kāpiti Coast | 2021 | Kāpiti Coast District Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 19 |
| Wellington - Hutt City | 2021 | Hutt City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 12 |
| Wellington - Upper Hutt City | 2021 | Upper Hutt City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 7 |
| Wellington City | 2019–2020 | Wellington City Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 12 |
| Wellington | 2012–2014 | Greater Wellington Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 300 |
West Coast
1 survey · most recent 2024
| Survey | Flown | Licensed by | Products | Tiles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Coast | 2020–2024 | West Coast Regional Council | DEM + DSM · 1 m | 843 |
Where the data lives
All of it is the same underlying survey data, published four ways for four different needs.
- LINZ Data Service — browse and download individual layers, or stream them into GIS software over WMTS and WFS. This is where you go for a specific survey as a file.
- Registry of Open Data on AWS — the whole national collection as Cloud Optimised GeoTIFFs with STAC metadata in the
nz-elevationS3 bucket, no AWS account needed. Best for bulk and for programmatic access; it is what this site reads. - github.com/linz/elevation — LINZ's own documentation of the open elevation data, including how the collections are structured.
- LINZ Basemaps — pre-rendered elevation and hillshade tiles for putting terrain behind a web map without processing anything.
International mirrors carry it too: OpenTopography hosts several New Zealand point-cloud datasets, and Open Topo Data serves the 8 m national DEM through a public elevation API.
Working with coverage in this tool
Every result on this site reads the national 1 m mosaic — the union of all 104 surveys — and drops to the 8 m DEM only where it has to. Because the two get mixed at survey edges, every contour set, profile and terrain report states what proportion of the area came from the fallback, so you always know which data a number rests on.
Found coverage over your place?
Draw an area and get contours, slope, drainage or a full terrain report from the same LiDAR — free, no account, nothing to install.
Frequently asked questions
How much of New Zealand has LiDAR coverage?
LINZ has published 104 LiDAR surveys covering every region of New Zealand except the offshore islands, flown between 2008 and 2026. Coverage of the mainland is now well over 80%, with the remaining gaps concentrated in remote alpine and back-country areas of Fiordland, the Southern Alps and inland Otago. The fastest way to know about a specific place is to check it — the tool at the top of this page samples the elevation data itself rather than reading a survey outline.
How do I find out what year the LiDAR over my property was flown?
Search your address in the coverage checker above. It returns the survey that covers the point and the years that survey was flown. Where several surveys overlap — common in Canterbury, Wellington and Otago, which have been flown two or three times — all of them are listed, newest first, because the national 1 m mosaic serves the most recent capture.
Why does the capture year matter?
A digital elevation model is a snapshot of the ground on the day it was flown. Earthworks, subdivision, forestry, slips, coastal erosion and river movement all change the ground after that. A 2011 survey will not show a terrace cut in 2019 or a stopbank raised in 2022. For planning, consent or earthworks decisions the capture year tells you how much you can trust a contour, and whether a fresh survey is warranted.
What happens where there is no LiDAR?
Elevation falls back to the national 8 m DEM, which LINZ produced by interpolating 20 m contour lines from the 1:50,000 topographic maps. LINZ describes it as suitable for cartographic visualisation only, and explicitly not suitable for terrain analysis. It is fine for a general sense of the landscape and useless for anything that turns on half a metre — so contour intervals below about 5 m, slope analysis on gentle ground and any building-platform work need real LiDAR.
What is the difference between the DEM and the DSM?
The DEM (digital elevation model) is the bare earth with vegetation and buildings stripped out. The DSM (digital surface model) is the top of everything — tree canopy, roofs, powerlines. Use the DEM for ground contours, drainage and earthworks; use the DSM when what is standing on the ground matters, such as shading, line of sight over a shelterbelt, or roof heights. Most LINZ surveys publish both.
Is the LiDAR data free to use, and who do I credit?
Every survey listed here is published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 and can be used commercially. The credit is the part people get wrong: copyright sits with the body that commissioned the survey — a regional or district council, Waka Kotahi, NIWA, BOPLASS and around thirty others — not with LINZ, which hosts and processes the national dataset. LINZ asks for "Sourced from the LINZ Data Service and licensed by (the licensor) for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence", with the correct licensor named. The licensor for each survey is in the "Licensed by" column above, and every file exported from this site names the licensors for the area it covers.
Related guides
- LiDAR data for New Zealand — what LiDAR is, how the National Elevation Programme was funded and what the data can do.
- Download DEM data for New Zealand — DEM, DSM and DTM explained, and how to get the raw files.
- Slope maps for building consent — why capture year and resolution matter when a council is reading your plans.
- Contour maps for a property — generate contours over a legal title boundary.
- Contour lines for New Zealand — every export format and how to pick an interval.